Trumps
Voter Fraud source outs self
Politics Esquire
CNN's
Chris Cuomo Allowed Trump's Voter Fraud 'Source' to Own Himself
Jack Holmes,Esquire 23 hours ago
Gregg
Phillips is a walking advertisement for a logic class. Phillips, who heads a
conservative advocacy group, is the "source" for President Donald
Trump's claim that 3 million people voted illegally in the last election.
Phillips tweeted this claim, without evidence of any kind, so of course the
leader of the free world picked it up and trumpeted it as fact in his ongoing,
thoroughly bizarre attempt to undermine
the legitimacy of an election he won.
Phillips
seems eager to make a name for himself, so he joined Chris Cuomo on CNN's New
Day this
morning to explain how he was absolutely positive 3 million people cheated our
election system, and you should be, too, although he doesn't want to show you
the proof because he's still "checking" it.
Initially,
Phillips tried to run through a bunch of jargon about algorithms, but Cuomo
didn't bite. "If I say I know," Cuomo said, switching roles for a
second, "And then you say, 'Great! Prove it.' And I say, 'I can't, because
I'm not done checking whether or not I'm sure, it sounds unconvincing."
"Unconvincing"
is being kind. It sounds like you found a conclusion you liked and are now
trying to gin up evidence to prove it-or stall until people get distracted and
forget.
"It's
not different than, say, a poll," Phillips said later. "You guys
quote polls all the time."
"It
better be a lot different," Cuomo said, exasperated. "Because that is
a guesstimate. A poll is a guesstimate."
"But they've actually talked to people."
Yes,
Gregg, they talked to people to ask their opinion for an opinion poll.
You are stating that, in cold hard reality, 3 million people committed a felony
and undermined the legitimacy of a democratic election for President of the
United States. To wit:
"It
better not be a survey," Cuomo said. "It better be a fixed number of
votes that were wrongfully cast. Because it can't be a guess, it can't be an
estimate, because this is about the legitimacy of a democracy. You have put it
on the line saying it is illegitimate. You've said our process was
illegitimate, and you can prove it. Now you're saying, 'well, we're not there
yet, we're still checking.'"
He
added that all the statistics that we do have - that were made public, because
the people that gathered them did not have disdain for the scientific method - indicate voter
fraud is exceedingly rare.
"The
minimus, small - the number of prosecuted cases in the dozens. Over a billion
votes were surveyed, and they came back with marginal results. You're saying
you can prove 3 million people. The only other person who says that is the
President of the United States, so you've got to prove it."
How's
that for a wake-up call?
Eventually,
after Phillips repeatedly guaranteed 3 million people voted but declined to
offer any evidence, Cuomo got down to the foundations of this rolling shitshow:
"Why would I believe your conclusion when you won't show me your method
and means and analysis?"
The
burden of proof is on the person making the claim. It is not on Cuomo to prove
Phillips doesn't have evidence there was
widespread fraud, it is on Phillips to produce the evidence to back up his
claim. If I tell you there's a magic unicorn galloping through space between
Earth and Mars-to paraphrase a very famous
analogy-it
is my responsibility to prove to you that it is true. For me to demand that you
prove there isn't a magic unicorn galloping
through space between Earth and Mars is functionally absurd.
When
Phillips says, "I know. You just don't believe that I know," it's
both nonsense and a great example of this kind of magical thinking. Cuomo
doesn't believe him because Phillips has given him no reason to. Phillips'
belief that something is true has no actual bearing on whether it is true.
[contentlinks
align="center" textonly="false" numbered="false"
headline="Related%20Story"
customtitles="Steve%20King's%20Calculator%20Says%20Voter%20Fraud%20Happened"
customimages="" content="article.52551"]
Eventually,
Phillips defaulted to a previous defense: the helpless bureaucrat. "I'm
just a guy," he told Cuomo. Not anymore, champ. "For us, it's
tedious" to check that the evidence he cited is acccurate, he added.
"We're volunteers."
Then
Phillips gave away the game: He hinted that maybe the investigation would
switch to the Justice Department under Attorney General nominee Jefferson
Beauregard Sessions III-noted friend of
voting rights-so
that a federal government that has declared outright opposition to transparency
can come to its own conclusions about whether we need a crackdown on voter
fraud. And so we learned that this, like much of the other noise about voter
fraud from the last weeks-and, in truth, the last eight years-is really about
laying the groundwork to justify voter suppression.
"We
are as precise as we need to be," Phillips said. I guess we'll have to
take him at his word.
Analysis
– Isn’t it refreshing that a FREE PRESS exists, and can uncover and tell us
about this source of ALTERNATIVE FACTS.
No comments:
Post a Comment