Tuesday, January 31, 2017

BLOG SPOT 31 Jan 2017 - 08

Trump hammered for Holocaust remarks


White House calls outrage over omitting Jews in Trump’s statement on Holocaust ‘pathetic
Dylan Stableford  Senior editor  Yahoo NewsJanuary 30, 2017

Spicer says ‘the president went out of his way to recognize the Holocaust’
The White House says President Trump is aware of some of the criticism from the American Jewish community over the omission of Jews in his statement on International Holocaust Remembrance Day, but White House press secretary Sean Spicer calls the controversy “ridiculous” and “pathetic.”
“He’s aware of what people have been saying, but I think by and large he’s been praised for it,” Spicer told reporters at his daily briefing on Monday.
“The president recognized the tremendous loss of life that came from the Holocaust,” Spicer said. “To suggest otherwise, I mean, I’ve got to honest: the president went out of his way to acknowledge the Holocaust.”
Spicer became defensive during the briefing when he was again asked about the backlash.
“To suggest that remembering the Holocaust and acknowledging all of the people — Jewish, gypsies, priests, disabled, gays and lesbians — frankly, it’s pathetic,” Spicer said. “The idea that you’re nitpicking a statement that sought to remember this tragic event that occurred and the people who died in it is just ridiculous.”
Trump’s six-sentence statement, issued by the White House on Friday, honored “victims, survivors [and] heroes of the Holocaust,” but made no specific mention of Jews:
It is with a heavy heart and somber mind that we remember and honor the victims, survivors, heroes of the Holocaust. It is impossible to fully fathom the depravity and horror inflicted on innocent people by Nazi terror.
Yet, we know that in the darkest hours of humanity, light shines the brightest. ‎As we remember those who died, we are deeply grateful to those who risked their lives to save the innocent.
In the name of the perished, I pledge to do everything in my power throughout my Presidency, and my life, to ensure that the forces of evil never again defeat the powers of good. Together, we will make love and tolerance prevalent throughout the world.
Spicer said the statement “was written by an individual who is both Jewish and a descendant of Holocaust survivors.”
But its omission of Jews did not go unnoticed.
“The Final Solution was aimed solely at the Jews,” John Podhoretz, a conservative columnist, wrote in Commentary magazine. “The Holocaust was about the Jews. There is no ‘proud’ way to offer a remembrance of the Holocaust that does not reflect that simple, awful, world-historical fact. To universalize it to ‘all those who suffered’ is to scrub the Holocaust of its meaning.”
On NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday, White House chief of staff Reince Priebus was asked by host Chuck Todd if the administration was effectively whitewashing anti-Semitism.
“I’m not whitewashing anything, Chuck,” Priebus said. “It’s a terrible time in history. And obviously I think you know that President Trump has dear family members that are Jewish. And there was no harm or ill-will or offense intended by any of that.”
Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, and her husband, Trump senior adviser Jared Kushner, are Jewish. Kushner’s paternal grandparents were Holocaust survivors who came to the U.S. as refugees.
The Haaretz newspaper ran an op-ed criticizing Kushner for staying silent on both the Holocaust statement and Trump’s executive order, issued the same day, temporarily banning immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
“After the Holocaust Day refugee bombshell announcement, any solace that could be found in Kushner’s Jewishness is gone,” Allison Kaplan wrote in a column entitled “Shame on You, Jared Kushner.”
Priebus was asked if the administration regretted not including Jews in the president’s statement.
“I don’t regret the words,” Priebus said. “I mean, everyone’s suffering in the Holocaust including obviously all of the Jewish people affected and the miserable genocide that occurred is something that we consider to be extraordinarily sad and something that can never be forgotten and something that if we could wipe it off of the history books we [would]. But we can’t.”
The Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect, a U.S. civil and human rights group, condemned Priebus’ explanation.
“Wake up and smell the Antisemitism in the White House,” Steven Goldstein, the organization’s executive director, said in a statement. “President Trump and his administration are engaging in the kind of Holocaust denial we have seen elsewhere from the most offensive scoundrels of history. Is that what we have come to deal with here?”


Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive and national director of the Anti-Defamation League, blasted Trump for “overlooking the defining aspect of Holocaust Remembrance Day — the horror that befell the Jewish people.”
“As if this were not a sufficient error, repeated statements by White House surrogates in the days that followed only compounded the sin,” Greenblatt wrote. “Rather than acknowledge the oversight, Administration officials suggested that there was nothing amiss. As one official put it, ‘Everyone suffered in the Holocaust, including the Jewish people.’
“Wrong,” Greenblatt continued. “The suffering of the Jewish people is not an afterthought, a prepositional phrase to be bolted onto the end of a sentence. The suffering of the Jewish people is the whole reason that the concept of the Holocaust was defined.”

Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine was equally critical. “This is what Holocaust denial is,” Kaine said on “Meet the Press.” “It’s either to deny that it happened or many Holocaust deniers acknowledge, ‘Oh yeah people were killed. But it was a lot of innocent people. Jews weren’t targeted.’ The fact that they did that and imposed this religious test against Muslims in the executive orders on the same day, this is not a coincidence.”

BLOG POST 31 Jan 2017 - 07

Trump and Goebbels


These Joseph Goebbels quotes sound a lot like Donald Trump's media strategy
Alternative facts, truthful hyperbole - how Donald Trump handles the media sounds worryingly familiar.
·         By Shane Croucher
January 30, 2017 14:46 GMT
·             
'You are fake news': Watch as Donald Trump rows with CNN reporter Facebook/Donald J Trump
At 106-years-old, Brunhilde Pomsel, war-time secretary to Nazi Germany's notorious chief propagandist Joseph Goebbels, has died.
She only spoke late on in her life about her role working for Goebbels, which she secured because of her skill as a typist. But she said she did not share in the blame for the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis.
More from IBTimes UK

"I wouldn't see myself as being guilty," Pomsel said during a documentary called A German Life. "Unless you end up blaming the entire German population for ultimately enabling that government to take control. That was all of us, including me."
Goebbels, who Pomsel called "arrogant", was an appalling man who killed himself in the final days of the war as the Allies march on Berlin, and therefore could not be brought to justice for his Nazi crimes.
But he was also a very smart man who understood the huge power of propaganda and how it could be deployed with chilling effect. Even today, over 70 years after his death, we can see his theories resonating in political propaganda.
Most politicians and governments deploy spin and rhetoric to some degree. But there are troubling echoes of Goebbels in Donald Trump's campaign for the White House and early presidency. In particular, Goebbels's understanding of how effective propaganda could be if it is used aggressively and without scruples.
Here is how Goebbels's theories in his own words can be seen deployed in practice by today's Trump presidency, whether or not the administration realizes the similarities in its tactics. 
Joseph Goebbels (Getty)
It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.

Trump's spokesman Sean Spicer was sent out during the administration's first press conference to berate the media for its coverage of inauguration crowds. During that press conference, Spicer called it "the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period, both in person and around the globe", for which there is no evidence, and images from the day suggest otherwise.

He made a number of other misleading assertions about the size of the inauguration crowd, based on a faulty comparison with Obama's second inauguration, using the number of travellers on the Metro. Later, he peddled Trump's unevidenced claim that millions of people voted illegally in the election.
Trump himself falsely claimed to have saved and created thousands of American jobs since he won the election. In one example, he claimed credit for the creation of 5,000 jobs by Sprint, even though they had been announced before the election.
The Trump team know that there is enough doubt and mistrust of the media that they can put out their own "alternative facts", as top Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway put it, and many people will believe them over journalists. This is a postmodern view of facts — that there is no objective truth, but many 'truths'. It's a question of who the audience trusts more.
Plus, this is a test of loyalty for those who back Trump or work for him. Do they support him enough – is his power over them sufficiently strong – to sacrifice their own integrity by propagating and defending his untruths and distortions?
The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.
Trump's campaign was very effective at pushing slogans that reflected its most important values and ideals. Think: Build The Wall, America First, Lock Her Up, Low-Energy Jeb, Muslim Ban. These were simple, often-repeated messages that defined the narrative around Trump and his rivals.
Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths.

Trump is characterised by his populist flair. Demagoguery, in other words. What is important to him is the power of emotion. He and his team are very good at grabbing people by their heart and gut, as shown by his rapturous supporter rallies around the countries. He speaks to many Americans directly about their fears and concerns – adopting and amplifying them – and gives them the simple solutions they want to hear. The difficult practical realities of policymaking, which must be navigated by any responsible government, appear largely unimportant to him.
The president's attitude is probably best summed up in a now infamous quote from his ghostwritten book, The Art of the Deal: "I play to people's fantasies...People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular. I call it truthful hyperbole. It's an innocent form of exaggeration — and it's a very effective form of promotion."
Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.
Trump and his team's attitude towards the media is hostile. And it's fair to say the feeling is largely mutual. But Team Trump's belief is that the media should be much more sympathetic to his presidency, and they have given what sounds like threats to journalists who don't soften their tone about the administration.

Sean Spicer said the government would "hold the press accountable" when talking about the inauguration crowd debacle. Trump, who describes himself as in "a running war" with the media, refused to take a question from a CNN journalist during a press conference, saying "you are fake news". Steve Bannon, Trump's chief strategist, told the New York Times the media "should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while...The media here is the opposition party."
Source for Goebbels quotes: Goodreads


Don’t forget locker room banter …. If you don’t remember, he’ll grab you by the b….!

BLOG POST 31 Jan 2017 - 06

We know what you’re up to Trumpster


President Trump, we know what you're up to
By Michael A. Nutter Updated 12:27 PM ET, Mon January 30, 2017



Trump: Travel ban working out very nicely 01:07
·         Michael Nutter says the President needs to realize that Americans aren't going to share his bizarre, egomaniacal view of the world and are not going to condone his attempts to bully people

·         He says it's time for the President to govern for all people, not just a fraction of them
Michael A. Nutter is the former mayor of Philadelphia, a CNN contributor and the David N. Dinkins Professor of Practice at Columbia University/SIPA. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his.
(CNN)Dear President Trump, We know what you're doing, we know why you're doing it, and we will not tolerate it or normalize it.
You have mistakenly allowed yourself to think, and convinced your White House team of true believers, that Americans will adjust themselves to accept and conform to your bizarre behavior, your obsession with your greatness, your need to always be "right" no matter what you say, your ability to lie about or deny what you've said or not said even in the face of audio and/or video proof, your continued floating of conspiracy theories without presenting evidence, your abusive and aggressive tweeting AT people which sets your Twitter-troller followers into a frenzy to attack your critics.

We see all of these purposely hurtful, distracting and egomaniacal tactics for what they are -- publicly available literature would indicate that you may apparently be displaying signs of malignant narcissism and narcissistic leadership .

You will NOT be successful in trying to convince Americans, or any other world leaders for that matter, that somehow there is something "wrong" with the rest of us because we don't see the world through your warped prism of "win/lose," biggest, best-ever, largest, greatest, incredible, fantastic, first, only ever and "no one can do it like me."

You expose your insecurities and embarrass yourself when you speak in this manner, and your behavior forces many people to examine you in an unflattering light. Your words and actions appear to be classic "projection" on your part, revealing the following personality traits:
Small, like when you argue about the size of your hands.
Petty, like your public humiliation of Mitt Romney.

Insecure, like how you take people around with you to clap and cheer for you.
Obsessed, like disrespectfully talking about inaugural crowd size at the CIA Memorial Wall.
Deceptive, like directing Sean Spicer to report false information or allowing Kellyanne Conway to use the term "alternative facts" to explain falsehoods, as if we're living in the society of 1984's Oceania.

Devoid of empathy, like your inability to seemingly understand the pain and anger you have inflicted by your words and actions on women, Muslims, Mexicans, African-Americans, disabled individuals, the LGBTQ community and many others.
The lesson many people have drawn from your behavior is that you are employing the technique of gaslighting, defined as manipulating someone "by psychological means into doubting their own sanity."

These traits and character issues are of great concern to many Americans, and now you've apparently decided to start attacking mayors as well.
You met with Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel on December 7, 2016, at Trump Tower while you were President-elect, but now as President, you negatively and nastily tweet at him about serious public issues.

Did you somehow lose his phone number, and now can only communicate by tweeting AT him, rather than talking TO him? You may find this surprising, but that Twitter machine that is apparently surgically attached to your hand also has a number of other fascinating features -- it really is a PHONE that you can TALK to people with and communicate that way as well.
If you actually talked to Mayor Emanuel, you would know that there really IS a legitimate and proper role for the "feds" to play in helping Chicago deal with crime and public safety issues. For that to happen, rather than tweeting a threat that you are apparently considering invading the great City of Chicago, you could send your team to ask the mayor directly what his needs are and how could your administration best provide assistance and support.

After coordinating a plan between your administration and the Emanuel administration, you could then travel to Chicago and talk about the great work that you're doing to help the city. See, isn't that a great way to show leadership?

This is how real government leaders work -- we meet, we talk, we plan and then, we take action, together. The cities of America are what make America great, and having a partnership between the great cities of America and the federal government will be a key to the success of your administration. We should all be partners, not adversaries, in our mutual commitment to serve our constituents.

As a new person to public service, you would benefit greatly from listening to, watching and learning from these city leaders who are on the front lines of public safety, education, immigration, job creation, civil and human rights protection and government leadership.
Mayors will not be bullied or intimidated by you or your team on Twitter or by other means. Mayors are chief executive officers of their cities, and cities represent the engines of innovation, opportunity, economic development and progress.

Mr. President, try this strategy for a week -- less tweeting at or about people, more talking directly to and with real people about real issues that actually matter to most Americans.
Please resist the almost uncontrollable urge you have to publicly rant about whatever obsessions are rattling around in your own mind about yourself, your self-image or your self-importance. Your diehard followers still adore you, the election is over, you won and now it is your turn, whether some like it or not, to sit in the White House as the 45th President of the United States of America. It's now time for you to govern on behalf of the entire 325 million of us in America, and reassure the rest of the world that the gaslight period has ended.


The campaign is over. It's time to govern for ALL America.

BLOG POST 31 Jan 2017 - 05

Exclusion of immigrants


Six other times the US has banned immigrants
Donald Trump's 'Muslim ban' is not the first time specific groups or nationalities have been blocked from the US.

Over the past 200 years, US presidents have placed restrictions on the immigration of certain groups [File: Reuters]

On Friday, Donald Trump barred citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries - Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen - from entering the United States for at least the next 90 days.

He also suspended the US refugee programme for 120 days, specifically
 banning Syrian refugees until further notice, reduced the number of refugees who would be admitted this year to 50,000 and specified that refugees who were from a religious minority and fleeing religious persecution should be prioritised.
A federal judge has blocked part of Trump's executive order, ruling that travellers who have already landed in the US with valid visas should not be sent back to their home countries, and protests in response to passport holders from some Arab countries, including US green card holders, being blocked from passing through customs or prevented from boarding US-bound planes, have taken place at airports across the country.

But this is not the first time that the US has banned immigrants from its shores. Over the past 200 years, successive American presidents have placed restrictions on the immigration of certain groups. 
Here are six occasions when laws have been passed to restrict some people from entering the country.

Exclusion of the Chinese

President Chester A. Arthur.

Signed on May 6, 1882. 
The Chinese Exclusion Act, which banned "skilled and unskilled labourers and Chinese employed in mining" from entering the US for 10 years, was the first significant law restricting immigration to the country. It came at a time when the US was struggling with high unemployment and, although Chinese made up a very small segment of the country's workforce, they were nevertheless scapegoated for its social and economic woes.

The law also placed restrictions on Chinese who were already in the US, forcing them to obtain certificates in order to re-enter if they left the country and banning them from securing citizenship.

The act expired in 1892 but was extended for a further 10 years in the form of another - the Geary Act. This placed additional restrictions on Chinese residents of the country, forcing them to register and to obtain a certificate of residence, without which they could be deported.

This changed in 1943 with the Magnuson Act - which allowed some Chinese immigration and for some Chinese already residing in the country to become naturalised citizens, but which maintained the ban on property and business ownership. This came at a time when China was a US ally during World War II.

Jewish refugees during World War II
President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

As millions of people became refugees during World War II, US President Franklin D Roosevelt argued that refugees posed a serious threat to the country's national security. Drawing on fears that Nazi spies could be hiding among them, the country limited the number of German Jews who could be admitted to 26,000 annually. And it is estimated that for most of the Hitler era, less than 25 percent of that quota was actually filled.
In one of the most notorious cases, the US turned away the St Louis ocean liner, which was carrying 937 passengers, almost all of whom are thought to have been Jewish, in June 1939. The ship was forced to return to Europe, where more than a quarter of its passengers are thought to have been killed in the Holocaust.

My name is Regina Blumenstein. The US turned me away at the border in 1939. I was murdered in Auschwitz  10:55 PM - 27 Jan 2017

Anarchists banned
President Theodore Roosevelt.

Signed on March 3, 1903.
In 1903, the Anarchist Exclusion Act banned anarchists and others deemed to be political extremists from entering the US.

In 1901, President William McKinley had been fatally shot by Leon Czolgosz, an American anarchist who was the son of Polish immigrants.

The act - which was also known as the Immigration Act of 1903 - codified previous immigration law and, in addition to anarchists, added three other new classes of people who would be banned from entry: those with epilepsy, beggars and importers of prostitutes.

The act marked the first time that individuals were banned for their political beliefs.

Communists banned

Passed by Congress on August 23, 1950, despite being vetoed by President Harry Truman. 
The Internal Security Act of 1950 - also known as the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950 or the McCarran Act - made it possible to deport any immigrants believed to be members of the Communist Party. Members of communist organisations, which were required to register, were also not allowed to become citizens.

Truman opposed the law, stating that it "would make a mockery of our Bill of Rights".

Sections of the act were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1993. But some parts of the act still stand.

Iranians
President Jimmy Carter, April 7, 1980.

Following the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis, during which the US embassy in Tehran was stormed and 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days, American President Jimmy Carter cut diplomatic relations with and imposed sanctions on Iran. He also
 banned Iranians from entering the country.
Confirmed: Iran's Asghar Farhadi won't be let into the US to attend Oscar's. He's nominated for best foreign language film...#MuslimBan


Today, Iranians have again been banned - one of seven Muslim majority countries included in Trump's executive order

Ban on HIV positive persons
Under President Ronald Reagan, the US Public Health Service added Aids to its list of "dangerous and contagious" diseases. Senator Jesse Helms' "Helms Amendment" added HIV to the exclusion list.
In 1987, the US banned HIV positive persons from arriving in the US. The laws were influenced by homophobic and xenophobic sentiment towards Africans and minorities at the time, as well as a false belief that the HIV virus could be spread by physical or respiratory contact. Former US President Barack Obama lifted it in 2009, completing a process begun by President George W Bush.


Source: Al Jazeera News